The Lord Jesus's last supper with his disciples, hours before the crucifixion, had a very special significance. In it, the Lord established the sacrament of thanksgiving (or Eucharist in Greek), which is the sacrament that the Church will practice until the Day of the Kingdom. At this dinner, the Lord Jesus celebrated the Jewish Passover in a celebration of his own in terms of timing and form, and canceled it to establish at the same time his own Passover, the Christian Passover, in which Jesus was the Paschal Lamb, a divine-human Lamb, a Lamb who was offered once and for all for the sins of all humanity, a Lamb. He possesses the power of eternity, a lamb that He Himself presents to the believers in every Divine Mass to give them spiritual food and drink, which are the true body and true blood of Christ, so that those who partake of it may have life in them.
Since the characteristics of the Paschal Last Supper are fundamental to the history of the crucifixion, I will briefly review these characteristics before talking about the history of the crucifixion.
Easter characteristics of the Last Supper:
There are clear Paschal characteristics in the Last Supper[1]. Briefly, these characteristics include:
1- The Last Supper took place in Jerusalem (Mark 14:13 and its parallels; John 18:1). Jerusalem was very crowded with pilgrims during the Easter season. The population of Jerusalem was approximately 25-30 thousand people. While the number of pilgrims during Easter is estimated at 85-135 thousand people. That is why the total number of people during the Easter season was estimated at more than 100,000. Jesus was spending his night in the last week in Bethany (Mark 11:11 and parallels, 11:19, 11:27, Mark 14:3; Luke 21:37 and 22:39 and parallels), while he had the last supper in Jerusalem. Why did Jesus change his habit on Thursday evening and eat the Last Supper in the crowded city? Most likely to preserve the Passover rule that the Passover must be eaten in Jerusalem.
2- It happened at night (1 Corinthians 11:23; John 13:30; Mark 14:17; Matthew 26:20). There were usually two meals: The first Between 10 and 11 am, And the second afternoon. Therefore, the timing of the Last Supper does not agree with common custom unless it is a Passover dinner, because only Passover can be eaten at night.
3- It happened with the duodenum (Mark 14:17; Matthew 26:20): The number of participants in the Last Supper was twelve in order to agree with the Passover rule that at least ten people should participate in it.
4- Lean at the table (Mark 14:18; Matthew 26:22; Luke 22:14; John 3:21 and 23). In Jesus' day, eaters would sit down for regular meals. While eaters recline on certain occasions, such as eating a meal in the open (feeding the crowds), or at a party (Mark 12:39 and its parallels; Mark 14:3 and its parallels; Luke 7: 36-37 and 49; 11:37; 14:15; John 12 : 2), or at a feast (Mark 2:15 and its parallels, especially Luke 5:29), or at a royal feast (Mark 6:26 and its parallels), or at a wedding (Matthew 22:10-11; Luke 14:8, 10). Or on the Feast of the Kingdom (Matthew 8:11; Luke 13:29). It is not possible for Jesus and his disciples to recline at the table at the Last Supper unless it is a Passover supper, where the participants recline as a sign of liberation from slavery (in celebration).
5- Break bread (Mark 14:22; Matthew 26:26). Jesus broke bread during dinner. It is known that the meal begins with the breaking of bread. However, what is unusual here is that Mark 14:22 mentions a meal in which bread was broken after a plate was served (Mark 14:20). Passover is usually the only meal of the year in which a meal is served that precedes the breaking of bread.
6- Drinking wine: Jesus and his disciples drank wine (Mark 14:23, 25 and parallels). This is never a common custom because drinking wine only occurs on special occasions (celebration of guests, circumcision, sermon, Pentecost, Feast of Tabernacles). Drinking wine at the Last Supper is an indication that it was a Passover supper, where everyone had to drink wine, at least four cups.
7- Judah's mandate to donate to the poorAccording to John 13:29 the disciples assumed that Jesus had authorized Judas—who had left the supper at night (John 13:26)—to give something to the poor, and “it was night” (John 13:30). It is difficult to suppose that Jesus was in the habit of giving alms to the poor at night unless the Last Supper was a Passover meal, when it was customary to do so.
8- Concluding the Last Supper with praise (Mark 14:26, Matthew 26:30). Praise concerns the Passover Supper and is different from thanksgiving at the end of each meal.
9- Do not return to Bethany after dinner: Jesus returned to the Mount of Olives (Mark 14:26 and its parallels), to a garden east of the Kidron Valley (John 18:1), and did not return to Bethany as he did on the previous nights. Why? Because the Passover night must be spent in Jerusalem. In order for people to be able to adhere to this rule, the borders of the city of Jerusalem were expanded to include - in the days of Jesus - Bethphage and Bethany (in addition to the Kidron Valley, the western foot of the Mount of Olives, and the Garden of Gethsemane).
10- Interpretation of bread and wine: Jesus explained the meaning of the bread and wine at the Last Supper, linking them to his suffering. What reason behind this strange way of declaring His suffering? Interpreting the elements of the meal is an established part of the Paschal ritual. As the head of the family explains the elements of the Passover meal (especially the lamb, unleavened bread, and bitter herbs)[2]. Also in the Jerusalem Talmud there is mention of a metaphorical interpretation of the four cups. In addition to the historical interpretation of unleavened bread, there is an eschatological interpretation (related to the afterlife). This eschatological interpretation of unleavened bread is mirrored in 1 Corinthians 5:7-8. Here Jesus gave a new interpretation, his own interpretation, of the elements of the Last Supper in a new way that refers to his sacrifice and his being the Paschal Lamb.
Thus, the Last Supper was a Passover supper, in which Jesus was the Passover Lamb, as He offered His body and blood to those who believe in Him so that they might obtain salvation. The Synoptic Gospels understand this supper as an examination supper, as we will see later. In this last or Passover supper, Jesus established his own Passover, a new Passover, in order to cancel the Jewish Passover. Thus, the Lord began establishing the Jewish Passover, and then at the same time inaugurated His own new Passover, in which Jesus was the Passover Lamb who offered His flesh and blood to those who believe in Him as life and salvation for those who partake of them. This scene of the Last Supper reminds us of the baptism of the Lord in the Jordan River, where baptism began with a Jewish framework and Christ completed it and ended it forever to establish at the same time Christian baptism in which the heavens are always opened, invisibly, and the grace of the Holy Spirit descends on the baptized person in the name of the Holy Trinity.
1- The day of the crucifixion
There is no great difficulty in determining the day on which our Lord was crucified. Mark 15:42 specifies the day on which Jesus died as “the day before the Sabbath.” While Matthew does not mention the Sabbath day of the crucifixion, he clearly indicates that the day after Jesus’ death (27:62) was the Sabbath. When it ends, we come to the first day of the week (28:1). Immediately after Jesus’ burial, Luke 23:54 says that the Sabbath was about to end. John 19:31 mentions the preparations made so that the bodies would not remain on the cross on the coming Sabbath. Thus, all agree according to Scripture that Jesus was crucified, died, and was buried on Friday, in the afternoon. Of course, the Orthodox Church believes that Jesus was crucified on Friday, and reflects and lives this belief in the liturgy.
2- Steel watch
The Synoptic Gospels (Mark, Matthew and Luke) agree that Jesus was on the cross between the sixth hour (twelve noon) and the ninth hour (three in the afternoon). And the Lord gave up his spirit about the ninth hour. They also agree that darkness covered the entire earth between the sixth and ninth hours[3]. As for the Gospel of John, it does not mention many time indicators, but rather confirms that Jesus was an example before Pilate at the sixth hour (twelve noon) when he was sentenced to crucifixion (John 19: 13-14). This, of course, does not contradict the Synoptic Gospels.
A difficulty arises here in Mark when he states: “And it was the third hour, and they crucified him” (Mark 15:25). This temporal reference to an early crucifixion does not agree with the other three Gospels. Mark mentions the third hour (the crucifixion), the sixth (nightfall), and the ninth (Jesus’ cry). Matthew and Luke take the last two temporal references and neglect the first (the third hour), and thus do not give Mark the impression that Jesus was crucified early (nine in the morning).
I found several attempts to reconcile the four Gospels, but all of them were unsatisfactory. These attempts focused on reconciling Mark's reference (the crucifixion at the third hour) with John's reference (the appearance of Jesus before Pilate at the sixth hour). Either these two temporal signs are theological, or one is theological and the other is temporal, but both signs cannot be temporal. The only common time reference in the crucifixion story in the four Gospels is six o'clock (12 noon). This suggests that it was taken from a pre-Gospel tradition and was used differently by the Evangelists (the onset of darkness in the Synoptics and the sentencing of Jesus to crucifixion in John). As for Mark’s indication that Jesus was crucified at three o’clock (9 a.m.), it is excluded as a chronological indication. Mark himself implies that Jesus was not crucified very early (as the third hour suggests) when he mentions Pilate's exclamation that Jesus died so quickly (Mark 15:44).
The context of the Gospel narratives is consistent. However, verse 15:25 of Mark is an anomaly in the context. Remember that the crucifixion occurred at three o'clock, while Mark meets with his colleagues in the spreading darkness from six until nine o'clock. Did Mark mean preparations in the church tradition? Liturgically, the Orthodox Church considers the sixth hour to be the hour of the crucifixion and links it to the sixth day or Good Friday, indicating that Christ created man (or Adam) anew on the sixth day (Good Friday) while he was still on the cross. We sing at the six o'clock service:
“O You who on the sixth day and at the sixth hour nailed to the cross the sin that Adam dared to commit in Paradise. Tear apart the stain of our transgressions, O Christ our God, and save us.”
Also, the Orthodox Church's liturgy considers the ninth hour to be the hour of Jesus' bodily death on the cross, and it is sung in the ninth hour service:
“O you who tasted death in the flesh at the ninth hour for our sake, mortify the passions of our bodies, O Christ God, and save us.”
3- The month of crucifixion
Determining the month in which the Lord was crucified raises a problem when studying the Bible. The four Gospels did not specify a specific date of the month when Christ was crucified. But we can infer this date from the Biblical references to the Jewish Passover. Before talking about the date of the month, we must talk about the Jewish Passover first.
Defining the Jewish Passover:
The dating of the Jewish Passover according to the biblical texts (Exodus 12: 1-2; Lev 23: 5-8; Deuteronomy 23: 5; Numbers 28: 16-25) is based on the sighting of the full moon of the month of Nisan.[4]. At twilight, which ends Nisan 14 (Aviv in Arabic) and begins Nisan 15, the Paschal lamb is slaughtered and its blood is sprinkled on the doorsteps of homes. During this twilight (which belongs to Nisan 15) the lamb is roasted and eaten with unleavened bread and bitter herbs. With the beginning of Nisan 15, a full week of the Feast of Unleavened Bread also begins. Six hundred years before the time of Jesus, these two feasts (Passover and Unleavened Bread) were combined as one festive period. This idea of merging is important for us to understand the Biblical references to the Feasts of Passover and Unleavened Bread, as we will see.
The slaughter of lambs was initially done by the head of the family, and then it became the task of the priests in the Jerusalem temple. Because of the presence of thousands of lambs during the Passover period, the slaughter began in the early afternoon of April 14, perhaps six hours before twilight began, and then the Passover meal was eaten at the beginning of April 15. The head of the family presides over the dinner.
To understand the place of the crucifixion in the Jewish Passover, we must be familiar with the way the Passover/Unleavened Bread season is mentioned, both in the Old and New Testaments and in the writings of the Jewish historians Josephus and Philo. References to the Passover season are not always precise in determining which day is meant (Nisan 14 or 15) because the word Passover was used to refer to a feast, a sacrifice, or a Passover meal. Leviticus states: “In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month, at even, is the Passover to the Lord; and on the fifteenth day of this month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread to the Lord” (Leviticus 23:5-6). Numbers 28:16-17 is also clear and precise: “In the first month in the Romans, on the fourteenth day of the month, is the Passover to the Lord; and on the fifteenth day of this month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread, seven days of which unleavened bread is eaten.”
Josephus also affirms (History of the Jews 3:10:5 n. 248-249) that on the 14th of Nisan “we offer a sacrifice called the Passover… on the fifteenth day after the Passover is the Feast of Unleavened Bread.” Philo (Private Laws 2:27-28; n. 145-149, 150, 155) also speaks of the Passover as occurring on the 14th of the month and of the Feast of Unleavened Bread as beginning on the 15th of the month.
On the other hand, Josephus sometimes seems ambiguous when he says: “When the Feast of Unleavened Bread came, they slaughtered the Passover.”[5] “When the Day of Unleavened Bread came, on the fourteenth of the month.”[6], While the Passover slaughter takes place before the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and the Feast of Unleavened Bread begins on Nisan 15, not 14. We conclude from here that the chronological references to Passover, the Passover feast, or the Feast of Unleavened Bread are always chronologically inaccurate, and we cannot always build a coherent theory of the sequence of historical events on them without taking into account the way the scribes recorded these events in a chronologically inaccurate manner. It is closer to the common popular style, especially if the writer is not as interested in the temporal aspect as he is in other aspects, as in the Gospels, for example.
In this chronologically imprecise context, the reference in Mark 14:12, “on the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the Passover lamb,” may belong, since the Jews actually slaughtered the lamb on Nisan 14 (the day before Passover), while the first day of unleavened bread (when they ate the lamb) was Nisan 15. Also in Matthew 26:17, “On the first day of unleavened bread, the disciples came to Jesus, saying, ‘Where do you want us to prepare for you to eat the Passover?’” The reference is chronologically imprecise here, since the first day of unleavened bread comes after the Passover lamb was killed and eaten. Clearly, then, in the first century AD, the two feasts (Passover and Unleavened Bread) were so intertwined that they were not distinguished in ordinary speech about them.
According to the Synoptic Gospels, the Last Supper was a Passover feast, as we have seen, and it took place on Thursday night. John also (19:31) mentions that it happened on Thursday night. Since the Last Supper is an examination supper in the Synoptics and it happened on Thursday night, this means that Thursday was Nisan 14, and at sunset, which began with Nisan 15, Passover and the first day of Unleavened Bread began. But the picture is different for John, as the Last Supper took place on a Thursday night, but the Jewish Passover began at sunset on Friday, and therefore Friday was Nisan 14, and the Passover began at sunset. In John 18:28, on the Friday morning when Jesus was before Pilate, the Jewish authorities and the people refused to enter the Praetorium, lest they be defiled by not eating the Passover. This holiday began according to John 19:14 on Saturday (at twilight on Friday). This is how the Passover meal in the Synoptic Gospels was on Thursday evening (Nisan 14) and Jesus died on Friday (which is Passover and the first day of Unleavened Bread, i.e. Nisan 15), while in John the Passover meal (not the Last Supper) was on Friday evening (Nisan 15) and Jesus died on Friday. (Before the start of Passover and before the start of Unleavened Bread, that is, Nisan 14).
Because of the paschal features of the Last Supper, as we have seen, we have concluded that the Passover in the Synoptics began at sunset on Thursday and that the Synoptics indicate that Jesus died on Passover Day and on the first day of Unleavened Bread (Friday afternoon, 15 Nisan according to the Synoptics), since the Last Supper (which took place on Thursday) was a Passover meal. However, it is more correct to say that the Synoptics never mention Passover or Unleavened Bread in relation to the hours of Jesus’ arrest, trial, crucifixion, death, and burial. In other words, the Synoptics do not specify precisely when the Jewish Passover was. In describing the period in which Jesus died, the Synoptics’ Paschal references are references to the preparation for the Last Supper or to the eating of the meal (with the exception of Mark 14:1-2, which will be discussed later). The expression “feast” (Mk 15:6; Matt 27:15; Lk 23:17) refers to Passover but does not specify any day of the eight-day period of celebration (the Passover/Unleavened Bread period). As we found earlier, this temporal inaccuracy is relatively common.
In the following table, we summarize the date of Easter in the Synoptics (in conclusion) and in John:
| today | Thursday (Last Supper) | Friday (crucifixion) | Saturday |
| Synoptics | Nisan 14 (Jewish Passover) | April 15 (Unleavened Bread) | April 16 |
| Gospel of John | April 13 | April 14 (Easter) | April 15 (Unleavened Bread) |
Thus, in the Synoptics, the Last Supper was a Passover supper (in terms of its temporal location on Nisan 14 and in terms of its paschal characteristics), and the Lord was crucified on the next day (that is, on the first day of Unleavened Bread, that is, on Nisan 15). While in John, Jesus is crucified while slaughtering lambs in the temple (which is consistent with John's theology: Jesus is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world)[7] That is, the 14th of Nisan, before eating the Passover lamb and before the start of the Jewish Passover, at twilight on Friday, and the beginning of the 15th of Nisan.
Attempts to reconcile the Synoptics and John:
So all the Gospels indicate that the crucifixion of Christ was on Friday. Because of the references to the Last Supper as a Passover supper, the Synoptics assume that Nisan 15 began at twilight (Thursday/Friday), and therefore Friday was Nisan 15. While the Jewish Passover begins in John with the twilight of Friday (Nisan 14) and the beginning of the Sabbath (Nisan 15).
Of course, many attempts have been made to reconcile the Synoptics with John. Some of these attempts assumed that one of the two dates was correct, while other attempts assumed that the four Gospels must be historical in nature, and therefore the Synoptics and John are both correct. Among these recent conciliation attempts are:
1- The Synoptics and John are correct: Their reconciliation is based on rearranging the sequence of events. For example, the Jewish authorities delayed the celebration of the Passover meal until they got rid of Jesus. Saint John Chrysostom is closer to this assumption. He says that the Lord Jesus ate the Passover at the Last Supper on Thursday night, while the Jews broke this rule and ate the Passover on another day because of their rabid desire to arrest and kill Jesus. This is why in Chrysostom’s interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew (Sermon 84:2)[8] The Jewish Passover occurred on the eve of Thursday and on Friday, the 15th of Nisan. But Chrysostom, on the other hand, makes room for another date for Easter that begins with the twilight of Friday (Sermon 83:3 on the Gospel of John).
2- The Synoptics and John are both correct: Because there were two Easter celebrations with one day between them. For example: Diaspora Jews celebrated for two days. Some support this assumption on the basis of the law stating that those who could not celebrate on Nisan 14 could celebrate on Nisan 14 of the following month (Numbers 9:10-11). Some also build this hypothesis on the basis that calculating Easter depends on the sighting of the full moon on April 14, and therefore the sighting of the full moon can differ in different regions. Time calculations differed in the diaspora, as the Jews were dispersed more than a thousand miles from Jerusalem, and there may have been a two-day Passover policy to ensure that the correct day was covered. Someone assumed that the Jews of the diaspora had used fixed astronomical calculations according to which Thursday/Friday fell on Nisan 15, while the Palestinians relied on the sighting of the full moon and thus Friday was Nisan 15 for them. Thus, Jesus, knowing that he would be dead on the second of the two days, chose the first day of them (even if he was not a Jew of the diaspora) and celebrated the Passover meal on Nisan 14, while the rest of the Jews ate the Passover on Nisan 15 (Friday/Saturday).
3- Another hypothesis based on two dates for Passover is that the people of Galilee used to celebrate Passover a day before celebrating Passover in Jerusalem. That is why Jesus and his disciples (who were from Galilee) celebrated Passover as described in the Synoptics, while John reflected the people of Jerusalem celebrating Passover on the next day.
4- Some also assume that perhaps the Pharisees (Jesus is closer to them) followed a certain calculation while the Sadducees (priests) followed another calculation that controlled public life (which is what John referred to). For example, when the Passover meal falls on a Saturday (as in John's account), the restrictions placed on work on Friday evening prevent the priests from slaughtering the required number of lambs. That's why they had to start slaughtering the day before, that is, noon on Thursday.
5- The Synoptics and John are both correct because the Synoptics were not describing a Passover meal, but rather were describing a non-Passover meal that Jesus ate with his disciples on April 14. Some assumed that Jesus ate a special blessed meal, and some also assumed that on the evening that ended on Nisan 13 and began with Nisan 14, according to the Synoptics and John, Jesus ate a pre-Passover meal, a meal that he designated for himself in order to precede the regular Passover meal that was eaten the next day, which was He knows he can't eat it because he will be dead. The Paschal references found in the Last Supper fit this hypothesis, the hypothesis of the pre-Passover meal: the meal was Paschal in everything except the lamb (which could not be obtained because it had not yet been slaughtered until noon the next day).
6- The Synoptics and John are both correct because they preserve the memory of dating according to the lunar calendar that Jesus followed in his final days. According to the lunar-solar calendar, holidays fall on the same days of the week every year. Thus, Nisan 15 (the date of the Passover meal) will always fall on Tuesday evening and continue throughout the day on Wednesday[9].
Comparing the dating of the crucifixion between the Synoptics and John:
Instead of the previous reconciliation attempts, there is another reading of the four Gospels that explains the reason for the apparent disagreement among them regarding the date of the Last Supper and the Jewish Passover. I will go through this comparison in a sequential way to make it easier.
First idea:
Before the Gospels were written, Paul the Apostle mentioned a tradition[10] It is accepted (perhaps dating back to the thirties when he became a disciple of Christ) that on the night when Jesus gave bread he said: “This is my body which is broken for you.” After supper he said: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood” (1 Cor 11:23-25). In other words, the Apostle Paul knew of an early tradition of a Last Supper before Jesus’ death, which contains liturgical words more closely resembling Luke’s account. In the same letter Paul asks his readers or listeners to purge out the old leaven as new unleavened bread, “for Christ also has been sacrificed for us” (1 Cor 5:1).
He says that Christ has risen from the dead and has become “the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (15:20). Clearly, then, the death and resurrection of Jesus are linked in the mind of Paul and his disciples gathered in Jerusalem, so that Jesus’ last supper and crucifixion can be considered to have taken place before or at the Passover, a fact that Christians understand theologically by linking Christ’s death to the sacrifice of the paschal lamb. Paul, however, is not the only pre-evangelical witness to this. 1 Peter 1:19 speaks of “the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot,” in a parallel to Exodus 12:5. Although Revelation 5:6-14 uses a Greek word for the lamb, arnion, which the Septuagint does not use for the paschal lamb, such an identification may be responsible for the image of Christ in Revelation (in a liturgical setting of incense, prayer, and singing) standing as a slain lamb whose blood has purchased people from every tribe for God. So here too we have a pre-Gospel theological correspondence of Jesus as the Paschal Lamb.
if First idea It is that Christians, before the Gospels were written, believed that Christ was the Paschal Lamb who was presented on the cross and slaughtered for all people. Therefore, Jesus' Last Supper was a Passover supper, at least from a theological standpoint. At this supper, Jesus takes the place of the Paschal Lamb.
Second idea:
In Mark 14 the Last Supper of Jesus with his disciples is presented as a Passover meal. This is clear from Mark 14:12-16 in the preparation for the meal. Luke 22:15 may have correctly interpreted Mark when Jesus in Luke begins the meal by saying that he desired to eat this Passover meal with his disciples. It is clear that in this Passover meal the words spoken over the bread and wine give the body of Jesus the central place that is usually reserved for the lamb sacrificed in the temple, a lamb that was never mentioned at the Last Supper. That is, we have here a theological explanation of the Last Supper being a Passover meal based on the pre-Gospel revelation that Jesus was the Passover Lamb. The question here is whether Mark himself was responsible for this phenomenon or whether Christians had already begun to depict the “Lord’s Supper” (1 Cor 11:20) as eaten “on the night in which he was betrayed” (11:23) as a Passover meal. The latter answer is probably more correct.
So if Second idea It is that Mark (and after him Matthew and Luke) presented the Last Supper as a Passover based on the pre-Gospel tradition.
Third idea:
The day that began at sunset with the Passover meal is Nisan 15, which is also the first day of Unleavened Bread. We have noted that Mark makes no reference to the date of Unleavened Bread in any account of Christ’s suffering after the supper. If we infer from the fact that the Last Supper is a Passover meal in Mark that the Passover began at sunset on Thursday and thus Friday was the first day of Unleavened Bread (Nisan 15), then Mark is mentioning activities and deeds that are very difficult to reconcile with a feast day. Nor does Mark reconcile the contradiction between the date of such a feast day and the arrest and crucifixion indicated in 14:2 in the plot of the chief priests and scribes not to seize and kill Jesus “at the feast.” If Mark created the date of the Passover meal, then one would expect him to have thought through the consequences and to have created greater consistency in his story. It is clear, then, that Mark accepted an understanding of the Last Supper as a Passover meal and did not attempt to change the basic story of the Passion in the light of this knowledge, because he was thinking of the Passover character of the Supper in a theological-liturgical sense, not in terms of history (the temporal position of the Supper in the chain of events). Thus, although Christians had early begun to think of the Last Supper as a Passover meal, this picture does not give us historical information that Jesus died on Nisan 15. In fact, we must abandon the so-called Synoptic dating of the Crucifixion as Nisan 15, a date that the Synoptics never applied to anything other than the Last Supper. The only indication in Mark falls within the above, that the period of the feast was remembered as a single festive period, in such a way that it is impossible to know which day of this festive period is meant. The nature of the material that follows in 14:1-11 means that without the Passover references in 14:12-14 we cannot tell accurately from Mark what day Jesus died (Nisan 14 or 15). The same is true of Matthew and Luke, who are Mark's followers.
if Third thought Mark presented the Last Supper as a Passover meal (based on a pre-Gospel Christian vision) and included it in the series of events on Thursday and Friday, but he did not attempt to align the temporal location of this meal with the other events that indicate the feast. Thus, Mark never mentioned that the Jewish Passover began at sunset on Thursday, but we are the ones who inferred that Friday was on Nisan 15, but Mark himself never refers to this directly. On the contrary, the activities that Mark mentions and the event on Friday (the trial, carrying the cross, people coming from the field, the crucifixion, buying spices, opening the tomb, burying Jesus) do not agree with a feast day, if Friday was on Nisan 15. Also, Mark’s references to “the feast” are chronologically imprecise, as are the rest of the historians, as we have found, and do not help us to know whether they mean the day before the Feast of Unleavened Bread (Nisan 14) or the first day of it (Nisan 15).
Fourth idea:
In John 1:29 (1:36) the theological vision of Jesus as the Lamb finds direct expression when John the Baptist hails him as “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” The Gospel of John never says how Jesus the Lamb takes away the sin of the world, but 1 John 1:7 and 2:2 do say: “And the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin” and “is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.” This reference to the Lamb of God’s death taking away the sins of the world is confirmed by the recurring image of the Paschal Lamb in John’s Passion narrative. The soldiers do not break a bone of Jesus (John 19:33), completing a biblical description of the Paschal Lamb: “not a bone of him shall be broken” (Exodus 12:10, 46; Numbers 9:12). Hyssop is also used to raise a sponge filled with vinegar to Jesus’ lips, and hyssop was used to sprinkle the blood of the paschal lamb on the doorsteps of the Israelites (Exodus 12:22). Perhaps also by using the “sixth hour” for the moment of the “preparation for the Passover” when Pilate condemns Jesus to death, John 19:14 refers to Jesus as the paschal lamb, since it was then that the priests began to slaughter the lambs on Nisan 14 in preparation for the Passover meal on Nisan 15. In other words, John, like Mark, weaves a pre-evangelical vision of Jesus as the paschal lamb into his narrative. Unlike Mark, however, he does not do this with reference to the Last Supper, for in John’s account there is nothing explicitly referring to it as a paschal meal, and there is no reference to the eucharistic body and blood of Jesus replacing the missing lamb.
John depicts the Thursday/Friday of Jesus’ Last Supper, trial and death as occurring on Nisan 14 (from Thursday twilight to Friday sunset), the Passover Eve of Nisan 15 (beginning at Friday twilight). Only one reference, John 19:14, speaks specifically of the “preparation for the Passover,” and it concerns Jesus as the Paschal Lamb, and this is a subtle implication. All this does not favor the idea that John composed his chronology to fit his theological vision (rather, his chronology was identical to the actual dates of the events).
if Fourth thought It is that John's dating of the Jewish Passover is clearer than the dating of the Synoptics because John's references to the Passover are not linked to the Last Supper, but rather to the crucifixion of Jesus (the Passover Lamb) himself on the one hand, and he mentions the day of preparation for the Passover before they ate it (John 18:28, 19:14, 19:31, 19:553) on the other hand.
Therefore, there are strong reasons to rule historically that John's date for the Passover is more correct and that Jesus died on Nisan 14 (Friday afternoon), the day the Passover lambs were slaughtered in the Temple. On the eve of Nisan 15 (John 19:14 calls for Passover preparation) the Passover meal began. The liturgy of the Orthodox Church adopts the dating of John.
4- Date of the year of Christ’s crucifixion
Jesus died during the reign of Pontius Pilate, which extended from 26 AD to 36 AD. The Evangelists, except for Mark, mention that Caiaphas was the high priest, but this does not help us determine because Caiaphas was a high priest before and after Pilate’s mandate from 18 to 36/37. How do we narrow this period of time to know the year of Christ’s crucifixion? Matthew and Luke point to the birth of Jesus before the death of Herod the Great, whose date of death is disputed, but most accept the year 4 BC. We do not know exactly how long before the death of Herod the Great Jesus was born, but many resort to Matthew 2:16, where Herod killed children two years old and younger, and thus they accept that Christ was born in the year 6 BC.
During Jesus’ ministry the Jews say to him, “You are not yet fifty years old” (John 8:57). If one takes into account the exaggerated nature of this statement, along with the birth descriptions in Matthew and Luke, we conclude that Jesus was preaching publicly before the year 44. Luke says, “And Jesus began to preach, he was about thirty years old” (perhaps 24 AD). In Luke 3:1-2 the word of God came to John the son of Zechariah in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar; however, this chronology is not without difficulties. Many accept it as August/September 28/29 AD. Luke’s historical calculations are sometimes inaccurate (for example, the census under Quirinius), and we do not know how much time elapsed between the word received by the Baptist and Jesus’ ministry: months or years? The fact that Luke turns to Jesus after twenty verses has led many scholars to take the smaller time frame and date the beginning of Jesus' ministry to late AD 28; but this does not quite fit with Luke's idea: Jesus was about thirty years old.
In John 2:20, when Jesus cleansed the Temple and predicted its destruction, Jewish opponents protested that the Temple took 46 years to build. Josephus[11] He gives two different dates for the beginning of the rebuilding of the Temple: 23/22 BC. And 20/19 BC, which means (after adding 46 years) 24/25 AD and 27/28. Although John places the cleansing of the temple at the beginning of Jesus’ preaching while the Synoptics place it at the end of Jesus’ life on earth, the majority accept the Synoptics’ dating, which points to the year 28 as the beginning of Jesus’ public preaching.
If Jesus began his preaching then (and there is a big “if” here), how long did his preaching last before his crucifixion? The Synoptics do not provide any help in calculating the length of his preaching, but from Mark we assume that it lasted a short period.
John mentions three Easters before Jesus’ death: he mentions one in 2:13, another in 6:4, and a third before Jesus’ death in 11:55. Are these references to Easter historical references in John, or are they mentioned because of the Easter motives in John’s theology? If they are historical, are these three Passovers the only Passovers during Jesus’ public preaching? If the answer is yes, how long was Jesus active before the first Easter mentioned? The answer determines whether we should consider a period of two or three years for His gospel. If we add two or three years to 28/29, depending on the month Jesus began his preaching in those years, we come up with a time period between 30 and 33 for Jesus' death. At each stage of the above calculations there is a degree of uncertainty. Blinzler cited a selection of one hundred Bible scholars for the year in which Jesus died. No one chose the year 34 or 35. While one to three scholars chose the years 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, or 36. Thirteen scholars chose the year 29, 53 scholars chose the year 30, and 24 scholars chose the year 33.
Astronomy played an important role in narrowing down the possible years in which Jesus was crucified. If Jesus died on April 14, in what year during Pilate's term did Nisan 14 fall on a Thursday/Friday? The answer to this question is not easy. Seeing the full moon is important for deciding the month of April. However, seeing the full moon is also affected by weather conditions. Since the Jewish calendar is a lunar calendar, elapsed months must be added to it in order to match the solar calendar. The great scholar Jeremias warns us that we have no historical records of the addition of shortened months in AD 27-30. To translate the date into our current months, we must use the Julian (Orthodox) calendar, not the Gregorian (Catholic) calendar. That's why it's not surprising that astronomers face difficulties. However, according to Jeremiah’s study, we have the following: It occurred on April 14th
In the year 27 AD, it was a Wednesday/Thursday, and it was less likely that it was a Thursday/Friday
In the year 30 AD it was a Thursday/Friday, and less likely it was a Wednesday/Thursday
In the year 33 AD, on a Thursday/Friday
If we exclude the year 27 AD as an astronomically weak and very early possibility for Jesus’ death based on the Gospel references, then we have two possibilities for April 14 to fall on a Thursday/Friday, according to the Julian calendar, the year 30 AD and the year 33 AD. In general, there is a tendency to reject the year 33 AD, because in it Jesus will be older and his preaching will be longer, because in it he will be 40 years old at his death, and the duration of his preaching will be about 4 years.
If Jesus died in the year 30 AD, he would be 36 years old, and the duration of his preaching would be a little less than two years. None of the earlier histories satisfies every detail in the Gospels. So we can say with a relatively high degree of certainty that the Lord Jesus was crucified at twelve o’clock in the afternoon and gave up his spirit at three o’clock in the afternoon on Friday, the 14th of Abib in the year 30.[12]. Glory be to your long-suffering, O Lord!
References for studying the history of steel
Raymond E. Brown: The Death of the Messiah. Doubleday, 1994.
Joachim Jeremias: The Eucharistic Words of Jesus. The MacMillan Company, New York, 1655.
Dr.. Adnan Trabelsi
This study was reported in:
Appendix Four, pp. 261-279, the third part of the commentary on the Gospel of Matthew the Evangelist, by Saint John Chrysostom. Translated by: Dr. Adnan Trabelsi
[1] Joachim Jeremias: The Eucharistic Words of Jesus. The MacMillan Company—New York, 1955. P, 14.
[2] The Passover meal begins with the Kaddosh, which is the blessing of the cup, and the first plate. After this, the Passover lamb is served and the second cup is mixed. Before the special meal, Jesus here took the Paschal vows, which culminated in interpreting the elements of the meal with the events that took place in the Exodus from Egypt: the unleavened bread symbolizes the misery of the past, the bitter herbs symbolize slavery, the fruit powder has the color and texture of clay and symbolizes the work of slavery, and the Paschal lamb symbolizes God’s mercy. Which broke (i.e. expressed: from us the word Passover) Israel from slavery to freedom.
[3] See Mark 15: 33-36 and 42-44; Matthew 27:45-50; Luke 23: 44-46.
[4] The beginning of sunset and its setting. The new day according to the Jewish calendar begins at twilight.
[8] See Part Four of this series
[9] Western scholars are overanalyzing and assuming. The four Gospels agree in placing the Supper on Thursday, the Crucifixion on Friday, and the Resurrection on Sunday. Jesus literally said: “With desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer” (22:15-16). Westerners are busy studying the Old Testament and the Jewish heritage, trying to link them to the New Testament. This is a dangerous slippery slope. All the phrases indicate that Jesus ate the Passover, that is, the lamb. The solution that does not complicate matters is to say that Jesus brought forward the date of the Passover since it was coming after the Passion. Luke’s phrase: “With desire I have desired” means a strong desire. It is the farewell Passover. What is important on that day is not the Jewish Passover but the farewell Supper. What is important in that is not the Jewish Passover but the Christian Last Supper that forever folded up the Jewish Passover. So why are Westerners interested in subjecting Jesus to the literal meaning of the Jewish Passover, when he is the Lord of the Passover? The entire Old Testament is a fiction for the New Testament. We link it to the New Testament. (A.J.)
[10] Paul says: He received the service of the Last Supper from the Lord Jesus (1 Corinthians 11:23), not from people. He was converted in Damascus and preached there, then he moved to Hauran, then returned to Damascus. It has nothing to do with the Jerusalem tradition unless we assume that the Eucharist was not performed in Damascus and Hauran (A.J.)
[11] History of the Jews 15:11:1 No. 380 and Destruction of the Jews 1:21:1 No. 401.
[12] With all due respect to scrutiny, the evangelicals neglected many things because of their absolute keenness to limit us to matters of salvation through Jesus Christ. They didn't care about quenching our thirst for curiosity. But knowledge is knowledge if it does not go to extremes (A.J.).